Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preston City Wrestling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 02:36, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Preston City Wrestling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local pro wrestling organization. Coverage appears to be routine sports reporting in local papers, nothing to meet WP:GNG. Mdtemp (talk) 15:49, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep PCW should stay up but if somebody could rewrite? its not me who made it - Steven Fludder
Keep I don't agree. I gave sources from some local papers but also from other papers more important. But if you want, I can add more reliable sources. Moreover, the partnership with Ring of Honor made this federation known in America. Lika0n (talk) 23:18, 28 November 2015 (UTC) (the creator)[reply]

PS : Sorry for my poor english. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lika0n (talk • contribs) 11:38, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep BUT completely re-write. Horrible grammar and reads like it was written by a child or someone who barely speaks English. Definitely doesn't come close to the high standard of writing that Wikipedia is known for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.105.145.232 (talk) 19:53, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:16, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:43, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've improved the grammar. I think the IP was quite harsh on the complete re-write but it did have issues that I think I've fixed. Definitely notable. Mega Z090 (talk) 22:08, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm actually surprised at how well sourced this is considering it's a minor league.LM2000 (talk) 04:05, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.