Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premi O Premi (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Premi O Premi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See film notability guidelines. This is an unreleased film. Unreleased films seldom have their own articles unless the production is itself notable, and this article doesn't indicate anything notable about production. (It doesn't even state that principal photography has begun, although it probably has, and may have been completed.)

Google search reveals that the hits are either, first, on the title song, or, second, 'vanity' hits that any unreleased movie gets. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Still fails WP:NFILM. The article should also be salted (protected from creation except by admins). Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 05:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 16:50, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 16:50, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and probably should be salted as well. The notability simply isn't there yet. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 02:54, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.