Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preetha P V

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 04:41, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Preetha P V[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One of two promotional articles created by same SPA (see related AFD). Most of the article content is unsourced and essentially a cut and paste of the subject's Facebook page. Note also that within a day of the wikipedia article creation, it was linked as the subject's website on that Facebook page strengthening the suspicion that this is another instance of COI/paid-editing rampant in this subject area. Other signs of this are the mention of parents' names not listed in any of the sources or (as far as I can see) even the Facebook page, and the publicity shot that is a higher resolution version of the image used on the Facebook page (I have deleted those as copyvio, as no authorship and licensing information has been provided).

None of the listed awards are notable or, at present, verifiable. Ditto for the career section, which reads like an attempt at establishing notability by association. The only independent, reliable source cited is this Hindu article, which is a trend piece about a cappella versions of Vande Mataram going viral (Vande Mataram is India's national song and there are literally thousands of cover versions; cf America the Beautiful). That is insufficient to establish notability under WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC. A final example of promotional content and source padding: the claim that the song cover received "good response globally" is supported by a single tweet linking to the song. Abecedare (talk) 19:57, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Abecedare (talk) 20:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Abecedare (talk) 20:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I reported the article (see related AFD) and due to some doubts about the article i asked about this with SpacemanSpiff. I believe that this is another sockpuppet of JithDominicJose04. Is there any methods to find the IP's used by JithDominicJose04 and Jdmlive be same or not? (Sorry, I am only a Page Patroller, so i don't know about these that's why I'm asking)

comment It is not a cut and copy of any data,for example if you are born to a father it wont change anywhere in the document he will be your father until your death so data will be same.Similarly the data wont change and the awards and recognitions will be valid till there s any issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.174.194.37 (talk) 02:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as although my searches found a few results at News and Books, there's nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom and above editors. Nothing in the search engines to show this person meets either WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:00, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.