Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Predictive costs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Predictive costs

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

De-PROD'd without any rationale in the edit summary or talk page, and no sources have been added.

My PROD rationale was: Can't find any indication that this is actually a technical term with this meaning. All results are simply phrases using "predictive" as an adjective. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete I agree with user PMC. It is a vague term that can be used in many facets of prediction and forecasting, but not a textbook term by any measure. Ode+Joy (talk) 23:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:NEO since we find no sources matching the usage in the stub. — Charles Stewart (talk) 20:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.