Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Predictify

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Predictify[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. This was a short lived internet company. Before isn't returning anything and the refs in the article don't support inclusion on WP. A separate unrelated company "Predictify Me" was created and went the same way several years later. The article was created in 2008 by an editor with less than 100 edits, the talk page for predictify has never been created. Desertarun (talk) 14:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:31, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:31, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: no evidence of notability. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:47, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:14, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.