Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pratt Place, California
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:55, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pratt Place, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The next tranche of California "Places" which do not appear to be communities. As with the previous set, they are all single buildings, mostly gone now, in the forests of northern California; they all get relatively few hits and none suggesting that they weren't single ranches or other homesteads. The articles consist of nothing but GNIS data. Mangoe (talk) 01:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
The other nominations for this group are as follows:
- Ralph Leggett Place, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Reeves Place, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Reyes Place, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Rose Place, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Scotty Place, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Short Place, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:18, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete/redirect all per nom and prior discussions. Reywas92Talk 20:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. If a redirect is being considered, we need to make sure that these don't end up in a list of "unincorporated communities" which they're most certainly not. County articles don't commonly list non-notable abandoned homesteads. –dlthewave ☎ 14:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.