Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prasad Ram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:24, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prasad Ram[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the general notability guideline. All sources I could find were either directly affiliated, unreliable (notably the Forbes contributor piece) or based solely on press releases. This VentureBeat source was the best I could find, still not much on Ram himself and seems mostly drawn from a press release. There might be a small chance that others can find suitable non-English sources, hence the AfD rather than PROD, but it seems unlikely. – Teratix ₵ 08:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 08:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 08:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 08:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 08:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He is the CEO of a non-notable company and lacks significant coverage. Waddles 🗩 🖉 20:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The business person lack the coverage needed to pass WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Venkat TL (talk) 07:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable corporate professional. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:48, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.