Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pragmoptimization
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:12, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable neologism. A Google search yields 0 hits. Phædriel 23:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologisms are inherently non-notable. Let it return only on the infintesmal chance it becomes a word in usage. Ifnord 23:34, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This phrase has become a commonly accepted portmanteau when discussing business process improvement. --Ghofbauer 23:37, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Can you please cite one or more sources showing that this is used? Stifle 19:09, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, a word that someone made up. No verifiable info that it's ever been used in the context described in the article. - Bobet 23:41, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable unverifiable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. Protologisms may deserve listing at Wiktionary:List_of_protologisms. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-05 03:52Z
- Delete. Original research. JoaoRicardotalk 15:23, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Quarl. Stifle 19:09, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. Sliggy 17:27, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.