Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prabir Purkayastha
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If someone would like to continue working to establish notability for this page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 18:25, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Prabir Purkayastha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No credible assertion of notability. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 02:57, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose the nomination. Prabir Purkayastha is a notable writer and genius from India. It can be collect more reliable source for notability. Plz give time. --Adv.tksujith (talk) 03:20, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:33, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No WP:RS to establish notability. Qworty (talk) 05:51, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 10:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete being the founder of a science forum is the only thing that might make him notable, but since we do not have an article on it, I can not really tell, and even if it was notable being a "founder" often is an accolade given to lots of people, so in and of itself rarely grants notability unless the thing is very, very, very notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:24, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.