Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powerline.io

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:39, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Powerline.io[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy software notability or game notability. The references are not independent. The page says nothing about what others have written, and so does not establish independent notability. The discussion of the developer is purely promotional. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:RS, and WP:GNG. The WP:PROMO is an issue that is often fixable, but it is the meat of this article in its current state. Shushugah (talk) 02:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A paragraph or two in one work does not notability make. Delete. --Izno (talk) 12:20, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On an aside, this sounds like "Worm Wars", which was a map set for Warcraft III. I've been wondering if such games exist. --Izno (talk) 12:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks WP:Notability and fails to pass WP:RS. Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete couple of passing mentions exists but that's it. Capitals00 (talk) 11:26, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.