Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power of a method

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 21:30, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Power of a method[edit]

Power of a method (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this concept is notable. The hits for "power of a method" I found are invariably about power of a test, or something else unrelated to this. Only source is an WP:SPS published by retired businessman Norman W. Edmund, and does not support the article at all. Paradoctor (talk) 17:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Paradoctor (talk) 17:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unsourced and completely OR. I can find several hits for the phrase in scholarly literature but all are talking about radically different things. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete If this was notable then it should also be in the base page methodology. I found nothing there, so it fails that test. In a search the phrase is so common that it is used extensively in other contexts, which also does not support this article. Ldm1954 (talk) 09:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Would a redirect to power of a test be useful instead if there are some uses like that in RSes or are uses too varied? Shapeyness (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    We need sources that define the meaning of the term. Us declaring this or that use to mean x or y would be WP:OR. If you think you can find such, great! Paradoctor (talk) 21:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.