Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Pro Kun Pocket

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 06:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Power Pro Kun Pocket[edit]

Power Pro Kun Pocket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:PROD. No explanation was providing for removing the prod, so I'll just copy-and-paste my original reasoning: Fails to meet WP:NGAMES. No indication of notability, and the only cited source is primary. Martin IIIa (talk) 14:54, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Martin IIIa (talk) 14:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Martin IIIa (talk) 15:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A grand total of 14 games in the series, which seems like a big enough deal for me. I don't think any of the indiviual games meet GNG; (see other deletion discussion), but they do have some media coverage such as: IGN, IGN Review, Japanese text reviews, GameSpot, Short mention in GameSpot.... This series really struggles due to it's mutliple official English names. Some are called "Pawapuro-Kun", some "Power Pro Kun Pocket", and some "Powerful Pro Kun Pocket". However, the series as a whole should be notable. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 15:18, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep these games do have some reliable sources coverage as detailed in the above post, passes WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.