Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Povertyneck Hillbillies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. --Bongwarrior (talk) 21:47, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Povertyneck Hillbillies[edit]

Fails WP:MUSIC and other general WP:N criteria Grsz 11 05:25, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:MUSIC, WP:N. Keep following TPH's improvements. Nice save kid ;). X Marx The Spot (talk) 06:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ Keep per TPH's recent edits. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 08:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 18:52, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did anyone bother to search for sources? Please remember Wikipedia guidelines say that nomination for deletion is supposed to occur only after attempts to find sources have failed. (Apologies for the lecturing tone.) It looks as if there are easily enough sources in newspapers to pass WP:N or WP:MUSIC criterion #1. Keep. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 18:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Paul Erik. That is a lot of g-news-hits for the band to not be notable. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 23:06, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Paul Erik. Possible bias coming from the same area as where they're popular, but clearly there is enough to count as notable. ryright (talk) 01:10, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Same as the sources. They have no wide-spread coverage. Grsz 11 14:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Paul Erik. --Bardin (talk) 08:36, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm finding multiple reliable sources which should be enough to meet criterion #1 of WP:MUSIC. Furthermore, the presence of multiple news sources originating from the Pittsburgh area would probably indicate that they meet criterion #7 as well ("Has become the most prominent representative of... the local scene of a city"). I'll start some WP:HEY work on this article once my sinuses clear up. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Withdraw Nomination, counting on TenPoundHammer to do the work he has suggest. Grsz 11 17:58, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.