Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postview

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:54, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Postview

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No third party reliable sources to contribute to this software being notable. 16x9 (talk) 15:54, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no signs of notability. Haakon (talk) 18:17, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is a simple blog engine (aka. Blogware). A variety of different products appear to be using this name. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:15, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ginsengbomb (talk) 20:17, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Have not been able to locate anything that will pass for a reliable source documenting notability. Favonian (talk) 20:44, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 22:18, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per anyone and everyone. JBsupreme (talk) 05:07, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can't find any reliable sources that consistently support this article. --FaceMash (talk) 17:40, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.