Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-election pendulum for the 2023 New South Wales state election

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The arguments to keep have not demonstrated a need for a standalone article. Nobody has explicitly shown that there is encyclopedic content that needs to be merged either, but I would be willing to provide a draftspace copy to anyone who wishes to develop content toward a merger. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:25, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Post-election pendulum for the 2023 New South Wales state election[edit]

Post-election pendulum for the 2023 New South Wales state election (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another contested draft without improvement. First, the sole source is not about this subject, which appears to be WP:SYNTH. Second, searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG. Draft was contested with an WP:OSE argument. Onel5969 TT me 09:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The article is a split from 2023 New South Wales state election. That article is too long to include all of the article's content. More sources will become available as electoral analysis continues. ABC and NSWEC sources are sufficient for now. --DilatoryRevolution (talk) 10:51, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/merge Most of the list is at 2023_New_South_Wales_state_election#Post-election_pendulum, and I simply don't buy it that half a table will fit but a full table won't and that it needs to be duplicated in a separate article. Same goes for the Pre-election pendulum, and with a list of candidates and a results page, surely this can be consolidated somehow. Reywas92Talk 14:20, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: we have other similar articles. Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 11:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OSE is not a valid argument Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.