Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Portuguese in Vatican City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Content will be provided to any editor who wishes to do some sort of merge Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 18:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese in Vatican City[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's no sign that this group (of 16 people in 2016) meets WP:GNG. The vast majority of the article is off-topic, being about Vatican-Portuguese relations rather than Portuguese people in Vatican City. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:41, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups, Religion, and Portugal. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:41, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources already referenced and linked in the article readily demonstrate GNG, including [1][2] and to a lesser extent [3][4] [5]. It probably makes sense to handle the topic differently, perhaps with a lead rewrite. It does indeed cover history of relations, language, etc. But such a change is an editorial choice, and needn't be enforced at AfD. —siro χ o 22:50, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suggest that the material on relations might be better covered in an article on Holy See - Portugal relations (which would need to be created, but Spain and France already have such articles, so it would fit well with those). Hmee2 (talk) 18:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 16 people? Nonono. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:04, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. the existence of this article did cause me to laugh very hard, but that is not any reason to keep it. a national community of 16 people do not need their own article. DrowssapSMM (talk) 23:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not enough here or sufficiently notable to warrant an article or satisfy GNG. I note there is an article called https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_people#Portuguese_diaspora in need of work that could reasonable incorporate a sentence or a line in a table on the Vatican. Also scope for creating an article on Holy-See Portugal Relations. Hmee2 (talk) 18:40, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would support some sort of split/merge like this. —siro χ o 18:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.