Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pop Minds
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 01:20, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Pop Minds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable game. I went to the publishers site and it isnt even listed in their publication list, i google searched it and only found a company called Pop Minds Salavat (talk) 12:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Salavat (talk) 12:15, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete-There're a couple of problems rearding this article. Number one, its not sourced. Number two, it is not notable (zero hits on Google, the only ones are completely unrelated to the subject). Number three, its been orphaned since 8 October, 2006. I don't think we should leave it unattended any longer. I say we delete it. Cheers, Zacharycrimsonwolf 13:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's listed at Amazon.de, but it's a German-only game. It might be possible to locate some German reviews on it. Gazimoff (talk) 18:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete on grounds of WP:V and WP:N. If a single reliable source can be found, it may be worth a mention on Jamie Stevens. Marasmusine (talk) 10:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or least merge into Jamie Stevens. A version of the official site on the Wayback Machine lists reviews on TLZ.de, Doppelpunkt.net, VIVA TV Switzerland, etc. --Pixelface (talk) 04:43, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not notable, in spite of the claim of "receiving rave reviews" on the Jamie Stevens article. No citations currently on either the english or german versions of stevens article about the game though. If citations are found though in german, perhaps extend the description on his article about it and put the citations there. - Owlmonkey (talk) 19:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.