Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pooja Dhingra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:20, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pooja Dhingra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non Notable. Fails WP:BIO Uncletomwood (talk) 09:37, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 15:12, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 15:12, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 15:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The BBC source alone meets WP:N: "India's 'macaroon queen'". That's international coverage. We have a poorly-written article, but one with four very solid sources that are all reliable and independent of the subject, three national news sources and the BBC. I do think the article needs a lot of work and expansion, but quality and notability are two totally different things. Montanabw ^(talk) 03:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There is detailed coverage by Forbes India. --Ipigott (talk) 12:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is coverage about her also in French. She was the subject of a featured article in L'Hebdo magazine [1]; a section about her in a book evaluating India's luxury market [2]; and another article in The Hindu about her newest restaurant [3]. Clearly passes GNG. SusunW (talk) 16:11, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - clearly has "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The sources cited in this article substantiate that the subject satisfies WP:GNG. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:12, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.