Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poochakkanni

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. plicit 10:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Poochakkanni[edit]

Poochakkanni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing was found in a WP:BEFORE except film database sites, videos, and promo material.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.--Filmomusico (talk) 21:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.--Filmomusico (talk) 21:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Encyclopædius: We don't establish notability by weather the director or cast are notable. We establish by sources. The sources that you provided are not considered reliable.--Filmomusico (talk) 17:41, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:43, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Before making such comments you should read WP:NFOE: 2. The film features significant involvement (i.e., one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of their career -GorgonaJS (talk) 23:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:06, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I added some references. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 06:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. While I don't believe WP:NFOE#2 is sufficient reason to ignore "notability is not inherited", both on general principle and the context in which that argument is presented, there have been additional sources added. Now, automated translation does not function very well on Malayalam, and some of the text is not directly parsable by computers, but I am going to WP:AGF that these sources contribute towards GNG and !vote to keep. BilledMammal (talk) 02:07, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.