Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polyparadigm/honeycomb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was ALREADY USERFIED, so I'll remove the cross-namespace redirect. -Splashtalk 01:00, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. (Possibly speedy?) This appears to be a user subpage mistakenly (assume good faith) posted as an article. The contributor’s user name is Polyparadigm (see article history). ♠DanMS 00:07, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Wait. I've notified User:Polyparadigm, and I'm hoping for a response. Titoxd 00:19, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Userfy or move to correct title, depending on his response. - Mgm|(talk) 08:58, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and/or Userfy Its a new person. Looks like a valid and honest attempt at creating an article. We have to be careful abount nominating these for AfD.... don't want to scare anyone away. Roodog2k (talk) 13:48, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Joaquin Murietta 15:45, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and figure out what its proper name should be. It needs to be moved, not deleted. -- Reinyday, 17:49, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Move to Composite sandwich panel and delete redirect. -- Reinyday, 18:52, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Wait. According to the creator's userpage, work on this and similar articles is in progress. I would be tempted to move it temporarily, if that's possible, to Composite sandwich panel so as not to lose the information, but I wouldn't want to muck up what this obviously capable user is doing. Denni☯ 01:34, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry for the late response, everyone. And thanks for the attention...I'm happy to do whatever, even to delete it. I'll try to "userfy" it myself, now that I (seem to) understand the problem properly.--Joel 20:48, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.