Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polyemmory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Polyemmory

Protologism - no Google hits at all, no verification offered. PROD was removed, so nominating here. Calair 01:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (nominator vote). Googling for 'polyemory' (one 'm') produces seven hits, most or all of them misspellings of polyamory. Note also the first version of the page, which made specific and untrue claims about e.g. UK law, which does not speak well for accuracy of the rest of it. --Calair 01:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Arbusto 01:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 01:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Mdwh 02:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Hello32020 02:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect to polygamy, then Protect. --Kitch ^{(Talk | Contrib)} 12:15, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you redirect? It is not in use, not a probable misspelling or search term... Keeping it as a redirect gives it way too much weight. Delete, allright, but I don't get the rest of your choice. Fram 13:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, term has no proven usage and is an unlikely typo for a redirect. -- nae'blis 13:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 14:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no redirect. -- Merope ^Talk 14:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.UberCryxic 19:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely Strong Delete and Redirect to polyamory, which is probably what this is supposed to be. --Mysmartmouth 23:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOR Made from thin air WVhybrid 01:30, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, not a valid alternate spelling of polyamory or polygamy. Eluchil404 07:45, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.