Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polog front (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Polog front

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Polog front (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page in question has already been deleted once as redundant and duplicating other articles. Now it is created again under the pretext that it has a different content. This, in my opinion, is frivolous. Jingiby (talk) 12:44, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's the same case as in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karadak front. With slight changes, it's still not a different article. On top of that, there are no reliable sources that use the term "Polog front". StephenMacky1 (talk) 13:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 1. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:07, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - according to Google the term "Polog front" is not used in any sources. If anyone thinks we should keep this article, it would be helpful if they could find a reliable source that uses the term. PhilKnight (talk) 13:49, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and North Macedonia. Shellwood (talk) 14:28, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, same rationale as for "Karadak front". --Local hero ^talk 14:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, can't find any search result for "Polog front". ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. And if this continues, more serious measures can be taken. Suitskvarts (talk) 06:41, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.