Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Politics1.com (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. — JIP | Talk 09:40, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Politics1.com (2nd nomination)[edit]

Delete NN, vanity/advertisement. Also should note this site is no longer live. Skrewler 08:32, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This was a popular enough site. I note sadly, however, that the blogger has put up his own vanity page [1] and is currently using WP as a venue for posting his CV. This article is fine, but the Gunzburger entry needs to be rewritten. Dottore So 09:12, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the same reasons as the previous AfD. Not NN. The site is up and running, so I don't know what is meant by "no longer live". Punkmorten 16:08, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm, I guess the site just happened to be down when I was checking. My mistake. Is it possible to withdraw this AfD?Skrewler 19:53, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I was at the last afd, and the reasons for keeping them are still relevant, if not more so, it's grown. I'm not even going to bother with checking WP:WEB criterion, it is a safe bet that it meets them. Karmafist 16:44, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not really worthy of an article in itself. --Depakote 23:15, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Punkmorten and Dottore So. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:30, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.