Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political positions of Cory Booker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Cory Booker. Kurykh (talk) 00:26, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Political positions of Cory Booker[edit]

Political positions of Cory Booker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Content fork from Cory Booker. Bigpoliticsfan (talk) 18:59, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:01, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:01, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:01, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with Cory Booker. I don't know why this should be a separate article.Sdc3000 (talk) 06:29, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or consider merge / redirect to Cory Booker The article is properly structured, well-sourced and part of a well-populated Category:Political positions of United States Senators that includes about 20 other such articles, though some have been turned into redirects. This could stand on its own but no objection to a merge / redirect with no prejudice towards eventual recreation as a standalone article. Alansohn (talk) 16:04, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with Cory Booker per above. If his positions become more nuanced and extensive or otherwise more notable on their own, it might be worth an article then. For now, it's fine as a section within Cory Booker. South Nashua (talk) 15:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.