Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political literacy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Nom withdraw.. (non-admin closure) L3X1 (distænt write) 23:17, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Political literacy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources indicating the notority or existance of the expression Holy Goo (talk) 18:58, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Has nom carried out any due diligence checks WP:BEFORE nominating this? The criterion is that sources exist, not that they are cited, or that the article is even coherent. A quick search finds plenty of sources, including Theories of Political Literacy, Literacy, Civic Education, and Civic Engagement: A Return to Political Socialization?, Literacy Cuts Both Ways: The Politics of Non-participation among Young People. There can be no doubt that the concept exists and is in academic use. The article needs serious work, but that isn't our concern here at AfD. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As the proponent, I change my mind to Keep. In my country, the concept of political illiteracy is known, thought it is only popular here. So that confused me. I wish to cancel the nomination. Holy Goo (talk) 20:24, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.