Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polina Kouklina
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. I'm taking merge as a different form of keep, as a merge can be discussed on the talk page. There is clearly no consensus to make this article a redlink, though. Courcelles 00:07, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Polina Kouklina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject had three Vogue covers over a brief period, but does not appear to have become a major model as a result, and hasn't garnered much coverage outside directory-type entries. Mbinebri talk ← 15:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 18:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I have heard about this girl. The article says she is a model and don't claim anything else. She is a model, that solves the case for me. I think however that the article needs an expansion.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:20, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - There appears to be sufficient coverage (see here) both to establish notability and to provide content for an encyclopaedic article. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into List of Vogue cover models as this status seems to be all that we can properly say about her. Colonel Warden (talk) 09:58, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.