Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poland's Next Top Model (cycle 5)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Poland's Next Top Model (cycle 5) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by creator, User:Michh1 with no rationale. I guess Wikipedia:Notability (TV shows) is more applicable; either way this stub w/no independent refs fails this by a long shot. While Poland's Next Top Model might be notable, it's individual seasons are not, and this, as well as other seasons, should all be deleted or merged back to the parent article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 19:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 19:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 18:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article shouldn't be deleted. Every season in other countries has its own article. - Sss28 (talk) 13:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 14:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.