Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokeys Night Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. G5 per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Escapement/Archive Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:09, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pokeys Night Club[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For some reason tagged for A7 speedy and then untagged again by the same ~~editor who is not an official~~ reviewer. I can't see how it meets WP:GNG or WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:12, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:36, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:36, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:36, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'll repost my proposed deletion rationale here. Passing mention in [1], but cannot find any sources that verify the indication of importance nor significance (with one exception of this source, but even this first person account only refer the subject as being "famous", and that alone cannot possibly establish notability. Alex Shih ^Talk 19:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.