Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokémon Insurgence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. At least for now, since there doesn't yet seem to be agreement about where to merge to. Sandstein 21:33, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon Insurgence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fan game. TheAwesomeHwyh 17:32, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. TheAwesomeHwyh 17:32, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Should probably get a mention somewhere given the first reference in the article, but I and the WP:VG/SE otherwise agree the topic is not notable enough for a standalone page. --Izno (talk) 17:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge Can't find additional sources beyond that Kotaku (from RSes, that is). There should probably be a section in the main Pokemon VG Series article about fan made games, which have individually weak notability but are notable as a general class of game to be mentioned there. --Masem (t) 18:50, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete An obvious case of WP:TOOSOON. Can be recreated at a later date once it gets more coverage besides just a couple articles.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:42, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 18:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Curious what people think of merge options regarding this article. Or should we just delete it?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:10, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.