Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Points of interest of Baton Rouge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Points of interest of Baton Rouge[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per my reasoning at the ongoing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of points of interest in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 21:53, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 23:02, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as useful for navigation per description in WP:PURPLIST; provides better and more organized information than a bare category. Would fit into the city article but its length merits breakout to a standalone list. A name change to "List of points of interest in Baton Rouge, Louisiana" is in order for clarity and consistency. - Dravecky (talk) 17:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 04:09, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep All I don't see any problem with this format. Just keep it blue links only. If a place is "notable" on WP it must be "of interest" in the real world. Kitfoxxe (talk) 04:22, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per WP:LISTPURP. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:38, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.