Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Point Zero

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A couple sources, but, per consensus, no indication of notability. Courcelles 23:04, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Point Zero

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable company. Joe Chill (talk) 14:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~, weakly. This is about a business in Montreal that makes sport clothing. Even modified Google searches like /"Point Zero" Montreal/ or /"Point Zero" clothes/ are contaminated by false hits, but I see nothing that appears to be about the business. I'd be willing to change my mind if somebody's search-fu is mightier than mine. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:05, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, even more weakly. Eastmain's search fu was indeed mightier than mine. Now we have another problem: the article does not speak to what the sources so found are saying about it. But that is a problem that can be fixed by editing. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 03:27, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:42, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:42, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Company with no claim of notability. Keb25 (talk) 11:41, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Some possible references are hidden behind a paywall, such as these stories in Women's Wear Daily. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:02, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:30, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Even with the references, there is still no claim of any notability. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 16:12, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There may be sources now, but still no indication that the subject is notable. Rlendog (talk) 20:57, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.