Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Point Project Management
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Point Project Management[edit]
- Point Project Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promo article, non-notable company. Nothing in Google News. Some coverage on the web (probably enough to decline speedy, which is why I'm filing this AfD), but not enough to satisfy GNG. Miracle Pen (talk) 20:08, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 16:52, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 16:52, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete blatant WP:ADVERT. created by single purpose editor.LibStar (talk) 08:30, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete blatant WP:ADVERT. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:47, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It can be difficult to objectively describe a business' activities without it being considered an advert by some, but I think this one is a genuine case. The organisation falls a little short on notability anyway. bobrayner (talk) 21:38, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.