Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Point Idalawn, Indiana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Point Idalawn, Indiana[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by @Jacona: based on finding information in newspapers.com; I've searched for this location in the same place twice and have only brought up real estate ads, real estate listings, auction notices, party announcements, 911 call reports, and two short pieces about an escaped lizard.

The minimal coverage present here indicates that this is a subdivision, and WP:GEOLAND does not extend down to the subdivision level. The real estate ads/listings and the passing mentions in the various reports/announcements don't count towards WP:GNG; and two short pieces about a (large) escaped lizard don't meet that bar themselves. Unless someone has better search terms than I do, I'm not seeing a way to justify notability here. Hog Farm _Talk 14:33, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. Hog Farm _Talk 14:33, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: It appears on USGS maps starting around 1961 [1], which makes sense because it lies on the north shore of Lake Lemon, a body of water which was only created in the 1950s. The creation of the lake created the geographic feature and a reason to live there. It is a populated area, but I'm not seeing any substantive coverage about it.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 17:45, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subdivision lackimg significant coverage. Reywas92^Talk 04:00, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
delete as is usual for non-notable subdivisions. Mangoe (talk) 01:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.