Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PointUI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:08, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PointUI[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fails WP:NSOFT and WP:NPRODUCT due to lack of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. SITH (talk) 00:17, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 01:06, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 01:06, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 01:06, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as appears non notable. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 18:29, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - some coverage in gizmodo (and lifehacker - which references gizmodo).Dialectric (talk) 15:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:54, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete An A7 case. Decade old and no referencing, because there is nothing beyond proof of existance. Britishfinance (talk) 01:20, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.