Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pogo (electronic musician) (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedily Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 11:02, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pogo_(electronic_musician)[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Pogo_(electronic_musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
In relation with WP:DEL, this article commits the following which justify its deletion: copyright violation (audio and video was ripped from copyrighted sources leading to various violations), advertising, lack of reliable sources, failure to meet at least one notability guideline specified at WP:MUSIC or WP:N Kandazburg (talk) 03:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. Re-nomination of article just kept at AFD by sockpuppeteering single purpose account.--Michig (talk) 06:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep. Disruptive nomination by probable sock puppet. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep per above. --sparkl!sm hey! 09:04, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.