Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poffenberger
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. --Titoxd(?!?) 04:49, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Poffenberger[edit]
clearly wrong WAvegetarian 16:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm not sure where to begin. This is a nn-bio, since the given establishment of notabiliity is completely fabricated. Or he might not exist at all. Would speedy, but didn't think it quite fit a category.WAvegetarian 16:54, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, apparent hoax and pretty close to nonsense.--Isotope23 17:02, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, hoax. Devotchka 17:17, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete hoax/NN/original research/complete bollocks, take your pick. - Just zis Guy, you know? 18:08, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Can we make a template {{db-bollocks}}. It would be really useful for things like this that are clearly nonsense but can't be labeled as such.WAvegetarian 20:14, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Extra templates are good, but apparently question marks are not.WAvegetarian 20:16, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Can we make a template {{db-bollocks}}. It would be really useful for things like this that are clearly nonsense but can't be labeled as such.WAvegetarian 20:14, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.