Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poetry of the Deed
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No consensus on merge. Flowerparty☀ 23:30, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Poetry of the Deed[edit]
- Poetry of the Deed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested PROD. Not yet released album, wp:crystal, unsourced anyway. Bonewah (talk) 17:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:55, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. If otherwise notable, would pass WP:CRYSTAL #1 because it is almost certain to take place, and would only would fail WP:NALBUMS if not enough sources were found on the article. For a guy I have never heard of there are sure enough ghits to assume sources exist. ZabMilenkoHow am I driving? 05:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Frank Turner. JJL (talk) 00:20, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pastor Theo (talk) 00:43, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unreleased album from artist who himself may not be notable.Merge Can be mentioned in his article. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC) Revised to merge based on some coverage found by Anakin101. I don't think it's enough yet, but others seem to disagree... :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:22, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Delete per ChildofMidnight. Doctorfluffy (wanna get fluffed?) 19:44, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. My initial reaction was delete, but it seems just notable enough. Many web mentions, not just spammy blogs, despite it being unreleased. E.g., [1] [2] [3]. Pre-orderable from multiple sources so passes WP:CRYSTAL. • Anakin (talk) 06:00, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.