The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:54, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Dicdef at best Ezeu 04:54, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This is no different from Broadcast chatter which does not have an article. Ruby 05:01, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Lockley 06:27, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete podcruft/dicdef/neologism/etc. no potential for expansion. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 07:53, Jan. 26, 2006
Delete - per nom. non-notable, boring -- Femmina 07:59, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
