Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PodSite

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:46, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PodSite[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable neologism which appears to be acting as a coatrack article for several non-notable podcasts. Artw (talk) 23:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:04, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:COAT. Google search doesn't bring up any relevant returns, which is weird for a web-centric term. "A search on an alleged "Internet meme" that returns only one or two distinct sources is a reasonable indication that the topic is not as notable as has been claimed." Per WP:GHITS. avs5221 (talk) 01:39, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A coined term that hasn't achieved notability. Jim Heaphy (talk) 04:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - probably a hoax as there is no real google results on this term. December21st2012Freak ^{Talk to me} at 04:39, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not only, a neoligism, but also the article looks more like a dictionary definition. -RobertMel (talk) 04:47, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable neologism. Anna Lincoln 12:10, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.