Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pockanchery Chandu Vaidyar
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Pockanchery Chandu Vaidyar[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pockanchery Chandu Vaidyar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage. The one source that it has is a dead link to an unreliable reference. SL93 (talk) 17:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 17:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 17:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, couldn't find any coverage outside of Wikipedia mirrors. Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 03:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Strong Delete No significant sources. The nature seems like a soapbox. Onmyway22 talk 10:03, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Rapid Delete How did this even get through the new page process? -- rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 17:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- expeditious delete per all of the above. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 03:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.