Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plunderer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Singu larity 00:31, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plunderer[edit]

Delete Fails WP:V, WP:RS and WP:FICT. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unverifiable fictional character, no out-of-universe notability. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 15:51, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Gavin Collins (talk) 16:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'll try to fix this one up as best I can. BOZ (talk) 17:08, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect if I'm not successful, though. :) This chacater has been a major antagonist to Ka-Zar, and other Marvel heroes, for 40 years, and is even appearing in comics on the stands even as we speak. Still working on it. BOZ (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I fail to see how this fails WP:V or WP:RS. Tomdobb (talk) 18:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Light on the non-primary sources still, but evidently a long-running and notable fictional character. I do wonder why the commentator above claimed the character is "unverifiable" -- perhaps he meant "unverified"? —Quasirandom (talk) 19:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the character is Ka-Zar's brother, and the article will be touched up. It is not going anywhere, and I'll create/write the whole thing from scratch if pulled anyway. Take heart BOZ!

Asgardian (talk) 13:30, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 19:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This character has been a recurring adversary over several decades and has been featured in major publications of a notable comic book publisher. The character's fictional history as it stands now is in keeping with WP:WAF; besides which, WP:FICT is a proposed guideline and does not bear the authority of policy. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 21:32, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the character has been around for over 40 years. The information in the article can be verified by consulting the comic books he appears in, so AFAIK this article does not violate any policy. --Pixelface (talk) 21:18, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.