Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plow Monday (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:08, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Plow Monday (band)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBAND. No national hits, national concert tours, appearances in notable festivals or national TV shows. Local band with local success. Rogermx (talk) 19:46, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 03:43, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep as they do have a short AllMusic bio and secondary coverage in the Austin Chronicle (reviews) and may have a claim to WP:NMUSIC criteria 7 as the most prominent christian heavy metal group in the area Atlantic306 (talk) 18:17, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- It is all local coverage and local prominence. Rogermx (talk) 18:55, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:29, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Few, if any, of the sources appear to meet WP:RS, some of them don't even mention the band, and most of the coverage that is from sources that might be passable are local. The claim of notability mentioned in the above !vote is not substantiated, nor is most of the content. This could be deleted as promotional, given the username of the article's creator, User:Plowjon. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:22, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 18:44, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Promotional article by SPA editor. The coverage--and yes, there is some--is local, small-time and routine and cites existence rather than notability. The authorship of the AllMusic bio is credited to the owner of a digital branding company and contains unverifiable peacock language that reads like a promotional blurb rather than a third party individual assessment of the subject. ShelbyMarion (talk) 09:44, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.