Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plexus (Law firm)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:02, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Plexus (Law firm)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could not find significant independent coverage of the firm itself (just passing mentions, coverage of or interviews with lawyers from the firm, and non-independent coverage). Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:40, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- as non-notable and clearly promotional. --‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 16:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 07:35, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing notable about this one. Random mentions from low coverage sources. Ajf773 (talk) 08:50, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a barrage of buzzwords doesn't obscure the fact that this seems to be a garden variety legal firm. A few mentions in general interest reliable sources, but nothing that is substantially about them. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:53, 25 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.