Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plenken
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. ✗plicit 11:05, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Plenken (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Klempen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Topics do not appear to be notable. Both articles cite few sources, none of which seem to be RS, and I haven't been able to find any other sources that aren't blogs, forums, or otherwise self-published or user-generated. Rummskartoffel 10:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Internet. Rummskartoffel 10:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.