Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Please Y'self

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please Y'self

This band elicits about 350 ghits but I do not find any significant coverage in reliable sources. I declined a speedy delete because there is the assertion of notability. Maybe the wider community would be best to make a decision here. JodyB_talk 16:47, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ Performing for 30 years. I think there are sources to establish notability out there, they just have to be tracked down. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I looked and couldn't find much. They haven't actually been performing for 30 years. They performed and then had a long hiatus as best I can tell. So, I think the nom is correct and tehy should in fact be deleted. Letting go is hard to do, and they're a nice enough band, but they don't meet the notability guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:03, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 00:49, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Child of Midnight. -- MISTER ALCOHOL ^T^C 03:58, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: CoM changed his vote... JamesBurns (talk) 04:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Mostly for lack of reliable secondary sources. Although supposedly created 28 years ago, the band's activity does not in any way asserts notability under WP:BAND. Whatever coverage present is extremely local. Plus more or less the entire article details a review, copied and pasted from here. ^LeaveSleaves _talk 15:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: insufficient 3rd party notability, as per WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 02:18, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.