Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playspace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Playspace[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One consultant's promotional concept. The only bits not sourced TO said consultant Pamela Meyer Ph.D don't talk about this. Calton | Talk 23:21, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. She did publish a book and two academic articles about it, through the impact is not breathtaking (12 citations to the article from 2012). She spoke about this at TEDxsomething_small... and I don't see any better refs. So far seems too much based on WP:PRIMARY, and with not enough WP:N, to be encyclopedic. Maybe in few years when this idea actually gets some traction? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 23:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Piotrus. I do not see sufficient evidence of notability. Vanamonde (talk) 09:41, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 03:27, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.