Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playkey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 03:34, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Playkey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, no references outside of primary source, no media coverage, most likely just some organization trying to promote their new service — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 15:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant coverage in reliable sources. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 09:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Medium-depth coverage in many independent sources; I'm not sure about the reliability of specific sources. Searching for "Компания Playkey" (Playkey company) may turn up fewer false positives. Most coverage follows a June 5 presentation, as this technology has not yet been released. The duration of coverage or its pre-release status may be factors in assessing notability.
Yandex may be useful in locating additional news coverage of the subject. ––Agyle (talk) 05:59, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:17, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 21:26, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.