Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playing with Dolls
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:51, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Playing with Dolls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILM. No SIGCOV. Rogermx (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 18:25, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: I found two sources talking about the UK DVD manufacturer retitling the film Leatherface: The Legend Lives On to confuse viewers into thinking it was another upcoming movie. This was well-reported on horror sites.
- Squires, John (January 8, 2017). "A Movie Titled 'Leatherface' Was Just Released But Don't Be Fooled". Bloody Disgusting. Retrieved 15 February 2020.
- Barton, Steve (January 19, 2017). "Faux Leatherface UK Debacle – The Director Speaks!". Dread Central. Retrieved 15 February 2020.
- It's not much but I think it indicates some interest in the film. -- Toughpigs (talk) 18:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:54, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:54, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Find sources for "Leatherface": (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL). North America1000 07:56, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per the new sources, Sadads (talk) 17:00, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Two articles on horror film buff blogs doth not WP:SIGCOV make. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 05:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. The sources do not meet the standards for quality sources per WP:BLOGS. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 14:24, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 23:16, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 23:16, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. --BonkHindrance (talk) 23:24, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Both Bloody Disgusting and Dread Central are WikiProject Film reliable sources websites for horror films and both have a paid staff and are not blogs, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:31, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I see a reason to keep the article under WP:NTEMP. and per the WP:RS. Wm335td (talk) 21:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.