Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plane Crazy Down Under (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 03:44, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plane Crazy Down Under (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:N. Most of the sources are podcasts, blogs, or self-published. There are a couple sources that look potentially reliable, but I would argue the depth of coverage is not enough to pass notability requirements. The page previously underwent an AfD in 2019 with no consensus and the page has had a maintenance tag calling for additional citations since 2010. I can't find additional sources online. TipsyElephant (talk) 00:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • It will be sad to see this page go but I appreciate the reasoning and how it fails to meet the requirements. Sadly, there's not a lot of references to the show in newspapers, magazines and the likes.
Falcon124 (Take that runway, and that, and that...) (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.