Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PlaNet Finance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the additional references supplied have not been considered significant enough to avoid deletion. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:01, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PlaNet Finance[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only references are a list of websites which do not have any affiliation with this organization. The title of the article is "PlaNet Finance" but the website for PlaNet Finance has been offline for years. PlaNet Finance is supposedly called Positive Planet now, according to the article, yet there is no explanation nor sources given to substantiate this. At the very least, the article name should be changed from PlaNet Finance to Positive Planet, as the article doesn't mention PlaNet Finance nor reference it.

There are no references in this article, other than a single 2015 blog post sourced from HuffPo, "Let's be positive", written by Jacques Attali who is the co-founder of PlaNet Finance, and was the president of Positive Planet at the time. That does not meet WP:RS or WP:NPOV.

No history of the organization's founders or current leaders are provided in the article. There are no specifics of what the organization has accomplished, neither in the past nor recently. I question its inclusion under our criteria for a notable organization or company.--FeralOink (talk) 10:04, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:30, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:30, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:31, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This may be a case of "once notable, always notable", since some activities have apparently been transferred to other organizations. I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:46, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:34, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 21:08, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, with prejudice Fails WP:NCORP / WP:PROMO. Corporate 'cruft. Was not notable then, and certainly not notable now. Sources are very unconvincing. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and comment above. Redditaddict_6_9 01:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.